Skip to content

New Paper – Williamson on Evidence Neutrality

September 1, 2009
by Christopher Cloos

I just posted a new paper on my papers page. It is a critique of Williamson’s notion of Evidence Neutrality. Here’s the abstract:

  • This paper looks at Timothy Williamson’s formulation of the thesis of Evidence Neutrality (EN). I motivate and argue for an upgraded version of EN by showing that changing one’s assumption about the nature of evidence (i.e. fallibility vs. factivity) generates a different verdict on EN. Then, I show how Williamson’s interpretation of EN is incomplete in light of a principle that guides his complete understanding of the nature of evidence. I reformulate EN to overcome deficiencies in Williamson’s interpretation of EN, and, lastly, I use cases from philosophy and science to show that reformulated-EN promotes better practices in both domains while, at the same time, it avoids psychologizing evidence.
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS